Home
lon

Originally published at LonPrater.com. You can comment here or there.

Just finished The Touch by F. Paul Wilson. It’s hard to make up my mind how I feel about this novel.  I’m of course an unashamed fanboy of his Repairman Jack books, and there were of course too many moments of “oh cool!” to count in this excursion.  I knew going in to this one (being from the Adversary Cycle instead of the RJ arc) that it had been altered to bring the story into the modern era, so that he can all tie up into one tidy uber-cool Secret History of the World.  Now, I read the old versions of The KeepThe Tomb, and Reborn.

With Reborn, I noted the differences in time and place–the disconnects in crossover character age, etc.–but I was able to put them aside and enjoy the novel for its own sake.  I was able to envision on my own what this story happening in the modern day might have been like, but because the story in front of me hung together well with its own internal consistency, all that meta-stuff connecting this story to the rest of the books didn’t jangle any bells.  The Keep,happening in WWII, was pretty easy to go along with.  And I wasn’t one who felt compelled to go read the updated version of The Tomb, which took Repairman Jack of the 1980s and flashed him forward into the late ’90s.  And still, I’m not really sure how I feel about The Touch.

My main beef (and I totally see why these beefs remained in the story, respect Paul’s craft decisions, enjoyed the hell out of that ending, and so on) is the utter lack of cellphones or internet, or even any mention.  One character goes on about having to type his document into the mainframe and the idea of a Google Alert never really dawned on anyone.  Crucial plot points just wouldn’t have been allowed to go on uninterrupted in a world where spectacularly rich people had heard about the invention of cell phones.  At the same time as these nits are nagging at my suspension of disbelief, we find references to Harry Potter and a clear indication that the end of this book is happening at the same time as the end of Ground Zero.  On the whole, I think I might have enjoyed The Touch just a little better if I hadn’t been plagued by the plot inconsistencies necessitated by moving the story into the Internet Age.

Now it’s a given that I’m going to read the “heavily revised” Nightworld when it comes out.  How could I not?  It will include Jack and be the natural end of a series  (saga, really) I’ve been following for years now.  But Reprisal I’m not so sure about, and here are my questions for any other Repairman Jack/F. Paul Wilson fans out there:

Should I read the original Reprisal or the updated version? Why?  Not knowing anything about the plot beyond its intimate connection with the end of the RJ series, I’m on the fence.  Will I come away thinking the plot suffered too much from the update, or is this book not going to be easily hampered in that way?

Mwahahaha! Another convert!

  • Jun. 29th, 2009 at 7:54 AM
lon

Originally published at LonPrater.com. You can comment here or there.

That makes three that I know of–two women and one guy.  Shelley will be converted, once she gives in and reads the first, I’m sure.  ;)

Being a person with the dubious morals of your neighborhood pusher, I lent my neighbor F. Paul Wilson’s THE TOMB.

She finished it in a day and immediately put books 2-5 on order.  I’ll say it again:  If you aren’t reading Repairman Jack, you are missing out on some of the best paranormal thriller action going!

What about you?  Are you an F. Paul Wilson/Repairman Jack fan?

Is there a particular series or author you “push” on anyone who will listen?

Eggy McFacealot & the New Windows

  • Jun. 23rd, 2009 at 7:38 PM
lon

Originally published at LonPrater.com. You can comment here or there.

Ugh.

Had some writerly/computerly turmoil over this weekend.  Started doing the old “submit stories to people who might buy them” thing, and encountered a problem.  Back when Vista was all I could get on a new computer, I opted to run Ubuntu instead.  Felt adventurous and I’d always wanted to learn a little about Linux.  Ubuntu had Open Office on it, and I’d been using that primarily anyway on my last laptop before it died.  Open Office worked fine for RTF docs at the time, which all my stories were in.

Flash forward a couple years.  As I start submitting these stories, I notice the format is going crazy.  Randomly switching from single to double space. Headers that were obviously on LSD…

So I did some research.  Turns out Open Office no longer really supported RTF.  I know, right? So I converted all my stories (grudgingly) to DOC. I checked they were all formatted correctly, and then saved.  I reopened the files: Still good.  Then I submitted them to markets electronically.

And that, kiddies, is where the magic gremlins live and thrive.  Because apparently, based on the emails I sent out, the formats have all regained some measure of their former dicked-uppedness.  Even though they were now in DOC.  A weekend of submissions going out and they all look like a typesetter sneezed for as much as I can tell on my end.

Kept me up all night, I’m not kidding.

Decided to give Vista a[nother] shot.   Desperate times and all…. It’s sat on a partition of the laptop unused for most of the past two years, except occasional excursions into molasses-time to do iTunes.  (The biggest criticism of Ubuntu I had before all this was the lack of itunes and webcam/Skype support.  Now, I’ll be fair and say Ubuntu itself is fast and easy to figure out for basic purposes–hence its popularity in netbooks, but if they can’t find a single word processor that can be taught Standard Manuscript Format, I’m Audi.)  After some consulting with a buddy, turns out what I needed to make Vista work–now that it’s had time to get out of “customer sponsored beta-testing”–was simply a RAM upgrade.

Got R Done and whammy-zammy, Batman, the Vista side is running fast!  It’s like having a whole new computer!

And then of course, in my abrupt abandonment of Ubuntu and Open Office’s unwriter-friendly issue, I discovered Windows 7 was out for testing.  OF COURSE I WAS SKEPTICAL.  But three IT guys I trust, plus the little dude at Best Buy all said they’d been running it just fine.  And I do have a problem with not being able to resist cutting edge techie stuff that’s free.  (I’ll never learn….)

Giving Win7 the old college try on the partition formerly occupied by Linux Ubuntu.  It is incredibly fast.  Thus far, not even one crash.  It has a bit more of the sense of fun that only rarely peeked its head out in earlier editions.  The themes and backgrounds have personality.  One of the pictures that came up on the desktop slideshow looked like the Space Needle and its reflection in the Science Fiction Museum in Seattle.  I’m fairly sure that’s what it is, anyway.

Win7 is very fast, and the most intuitive Windows yet.  It seems like they’ve learned something from Ubuntu and Mac (as usual) and  netbooks AND THE FLUSTERCLUCK THAT WAS VISTA’S EARLY RELEASE. There’s a neat feature where if you drag the window all the way to the left or right, it automatically takes up that half of the screen.  Makes it great for comparing documents, websites, etc. when you have the two windows on opposite sides.  Also good for file transfer.  If you drag the window to the top of the screen, it maximizes.  And the fun part is if you grab the top of a window and shake it, all the other windows fall away.  Shake again, and they’re back.

There’s a bit of coolth in the Show Desktop function too.  Roll over the button and you can peek behind all the open windows.  One huge improvement is the reduction of all those constant PITA reminders and “just making sure you wanted to do that” messages.  They wore me out.  There’s still some in Win7, but they’re like shy wallflowers now.  You hardly notice them.

And fast!  It is much faster than Vista, and at least as fast as Ubuntu was on my machine for booting, shut down and file transfers.  Yes, I did compare times with the extra RAM in.  I’m no more Anti-Ubuntu than I am Anti-Windows.  I only care what works and doesn’t cost me an arm and a leg for the privelege.  Oh, and using Wordpress website admin over the web was very draggy on Ubuntu.  Especially in regard to keyboard responsiveness.  Not so with Win7.  As I wrote this blog entry, I was transferring 16G of iPod music and movies over to this part of the partition.  Not a bit of lag!

So anyway, probably more Win7 geekery coming as I play with it.  It’s on a 50GB partition, with Vista still safely ensconced in the remaining 100GB.

I’ll keep the weeping and gnashing of teeth over my poor crap-formatted story submissions to a minimum.

lon

Originally published at LonPrater.com. You can comment here or there.

Saving this here so I can find it later and point at it every so often.  Originally, I tossed this out over on Sean Williams’ LJ in a thread about anti-media-tie-in snobbery.  I didn’t think to bring comics and anime snobbery into the post at the time, but I’m sure it has a place in there somewhere as well.

The history of SF snobbery, in brief: (TONGUE IN CHEEK)

1) Old guard SF got no respect from the mainstream literary crowd, who mostly believed POPULAR=TRASH.

2) The New Wave tried to get respect from the mainstream literary crowd, with grudging, modest success. Sometimes, they adopted the mainstream literary world’s P=T philosophy. I think it was what they traded away for acceptance, like in some high school drama of the 70s.

3) Major SF movie franchises, D&D, computer gaming and the internet happened. They all conspired as sentient things to reset the equation: it became P=$.

4) Now SF in it’s broadest terms thrives in all media forms. The only people looking to cut one leg off the table [ie denigrate media tie-in or other popular expressions of the genre] are those too hidebound or shortsighted to realize that it’s all the same darn table!

Advertisement

Latest Month

December 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Jared MacPherson